It would certainly be interesting if his slip of the tongue turned out to be true.
The Donald will be far less interesting if he is NOT running for president.
He is only interesting because he has a chance to do serious damage. Without the threat of being the president, the Donald will get the same treatment that every other over-saturated also-ran will get, and he will be added to the large scrap heap of weird stuff that has happened to American politics.
Think Sarah Palin.
Perhaps he will get his own show on Fox? Nahhhhhhhhh.
Mark, tell me that pattern isn't stitch work . . . Love it !
This is a month or two old -- still pertinent ? http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/05/2016-election-hillary-cli...
I think Eameshead is right. I also think Eameshead means "rogue" . . . ?
I kind of like "rouge" when applied to The Donald. I do have to image it's an orangey-rouge, though.
I think both candidates still have plenty of room to screw up and lose. Donald is winning in the race to failure though--at least this past week or two. Did you all see his latest? He just unveiled a team of multi-millionaire financiers as his "economic advisors" (all male, beeteedubs). And David Duke, former KKK grand poobah or whatever they call that position, has endorsed him! And said that Donald's followers are HIS followers...or something like that.
And Trump has reversed his blatherings about the "top secret video" that he saw on Fox News of money supposedly pouring off a plane in Iran. I suppose next he will say he was being sarcastic about that.
I could go on but I think I should probably try to think about something else for at least ten minutes today.
Good drama in that sky Mark.
Thanks for sharing your daily morning skies. I look forward to them now.
(Almost as much as the snappies of your pants!)
Love all the "incidents" in the clouds… like an old-master painting or something.
A belated good morning to everyone.
Yes, even Lunchbox and Objectworship.
Um…
So is THIS the moment that I finally got to witness one of Mark's quick-edits BEFORE the deed was done?
I actually was going to vote.
I thought the pictures were of real wine glasses! Then I clicked on the photo.
I guess that was the idea huh….
Is this a 1970's vintage photo?
Mark, are you trying to prove that you have big hands and are in fact a Democrat?
And just like that, Mark's post is gone…
I have a deep sense of accomplishment, now that I have been witness to a famous "Mark-edit" in real time.
So was it the smoke, the high-ball, or what? Or do you just like small /quick audiences? I still want to know if it was 1970s vintage. The photo I mean.
Aloha Poodles!
So sorry for the edited snappy of the "snapper" wine glasses last evening. I so want to repost it... yes I do..but fear of offending anyone (especially those with tender eyeballs), has my temptations under control...for now. Plus Alix has been threatening to revoke my holiday party invite (2016) for another year, and I have a sweet ensemble (and a back-up ensemble) chosen for the festive occasion. As most of you remember, I was dis-invited in 2014 for misbehavior, and split out a pair of pink pants dancing the wiggle in 2015. I must focus. I must. Alcohol and pubic hair are a bad combination. And don't forget to feed the birds.
Fondly,
Aunt Mark
If you need any help, please contact us at – info@designaddict.com