Design Addict

Cart

hollywood regency
 

hollywood regency  

  RSS

whitespike
(@whitespike)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 15 years ago
Posts: 3499
17/09/2008 2:49 am  

has been back in style for a while. your opinion ... good or bad? classic or faddish?


Quote
Robert Leach
(@robertleach1960yahoo-co-uk)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 3212
17/09/2008 3:44 am  

It's an uknown
here in Europe
I guess it's a bit like the 40s/50s French look?
(sorry to mention France)
😉


ReplyQuote
Riki
 Riki
(@riki)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 14 years ago
Posts: 1395
17/09/2008 6:36 am  

Relatively new term
It would be interesting to find out who actually coined the term "Hollywood Regency". I've seen it used in the antiques business only in about the last 4 or 5 years to describe certain pieces of furniture and decorative arts that came from the same period in time as Art Deco, (Arte Moderne, overseas) but that didn't exhibit typical Art Deco decoration. It was originally meant to describe items from the 1920's to the 1940's but I think lately it's really become nothing but a catchall phrase that people use to describe just about anything 20th century that's not easily classified into MCM, Art Deco, Late Victorian, Post-Modern, etc.
Hollywood Regency has typically been used to describe the look of Dorothy Draper, Tommi Parzinger, Karl Springer, et al, and is characterized by a lot of faux bamboo, burl wood, lucite, really big single pulls and hardware on chests, blanc-de-chine everything. It looks good in the right sort of California-style house but should be used sparingly if you are trying to mix it into any other kind of architecture/decor. It's just my opinion, but a little bit goes a long way. It's sort of over-the-top and a tad too glamorous for me.


ReplyQuote
Share:

If you need any help, please contact us at – info@designaddict.com

  
Working

Please Login or Register