Design Addict

Cart

Eames short H base
 

Eames short H base  

  RSS

Kyle James
(@schefflerkylegmail-com)
Trusted Member
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 44
17/12/2014 6:45 am  

So to start this off, I'm very familiar with the thread on identifying age and makes of the shell chair. Looked through pages curious about this one and found little on it. Also did some Google research but found very little.
So to start I know it's made by summits because it has the S logo on it, and also has the raised Herman Miller logo, correct me if I'm wrong. Also has some stamp that I believe is from the manufacturer...hard to read.
So to make this short....well, the base is short. Seems more like a lounge, but after owning 30+ of these chairs I have yet to see the H base in this low form. Also the fibers in the fiberglass seem a lot more textured and not quite as smooth as the others I've owned.
Is there any year that summits started producing these? I couldn't find a date on any threads...and my apologies in advance for bringing up an old topic under a new thread.

-kyle
<img class="wpforo-default-image-atta


Quote
NULL NULL
(@teapotd0meyahoo-com)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 4318
17/12/2014 5:14 pm  

Lounge height H-base.  Not that common, but not that rare either. I have a few of them in both zinc and black.


ReplyQuote
Kyle James
(@schefflerkylegmail-com)
Trusted Member
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 44
17/12/2014 7:37 pm  

Thank you woodywood, I had one other question about the fiberglass, I was told that the more fibers means that is an older model. This particular orange chair has very large amount of textures and visible fibers unlike my other chairs...do you think this might be a late 50s model?


ReplyQuote
Eameshead
(@eameshead)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 12 years ago
Posts: 1366
18/12/2014 6:56 am  

The fiberglass might simply be weathered a bit, giving the shell an older look? The Summit circle S embossed logo dates the shell from 1960 or later.
The use of the plastic glides on the base began in 1957 and were used throughout the 60s and 70s.
 


ReplyQuote
Kyle James
(@schefflerkylegmail-com)
Trusted Member
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 44
18/12/2014 3:20 pm  

Thank you Eameshead. You may be right about it being weathered. It's odd cause the whole shell has that effect, also the S on the base has no circle, not entirely sure if that means anything.


ReplyQuote
FLagent
(@flagent)
Trusted Member
Joined: 14 years ago
Posts: 56
25/01/2015 6:41 am  

I just got these two today. They are both obviously weathered but there is not a major difference between the top and bottom of the chair. Very very grainy. They came as a pair from the same house. Both are summits one has the S in a circle the other has a almost unnoticeable small s with no circle.
I would be curious of anyone's idea of a possible production date of these, also I would find it very hard to believe they were collected and assembled at different times. They are equally aged and they did not come from a dealer just a neighborhood garage sale. So what would be the opinion of the different markings on each chair?
Pictures 2,3,4,5 are all of the same chair. Picture 6 is of the other chair.
I hope this might help you Kyle! And also maybe help me! Thanks!




ReplyQuote
Eameshead
(@eameshead)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 12 years ago
Posts: 1366
25/01/2015 5:19 pm  

FLagent,
Going by the bases and plastic base glides, these are 1957 or later chairs.
The circled S shell was probably made in 1960 or later.
The shell with only the stamp was probably made a bit earlier.
Though the chairs were most likely offered and sold as a pair, the shell with the stamp (and no circled S) was probably produced a short time before 1960, before they changed the markings.
There is often quite a lot of overlap seen with these pairings / markings / chair and base combinations. Probably due to older stock at the factory being paired up with newer stock as demand and production dictated.
This pair was probably used outside for some time, causing the "grainy" appearance you mentioned. Sometimes the appearance gets more interesting, as the original shine wears away. Not always a bad trade off...  as long as the fiberglass fibers don't  become exposed.
Hope this helps.


ReplyQuote
Kyle James
(@schefflerkylegmail-com)
Trusted Member
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 44
31/01/2015 12:22 am  

Yes, i think that your correct FLagent. Its a little tough to search dates on these things. Most likley there was an overlap of company stock just as you said. I belive the orange chair is from 1960-1970 due to its color. They had quite a few different changes in colors and fibers after the 70s. 


ReplyQuote
Share:

If you need any help, please contact us at – info@designaddict.com

  
Working

Please Login or Register