Am I missing something?
I've read this thread and the previous one. I can't see how selling some nicely made runners in the correct wood and clearly described as reproduction is wrong in any way at all? Its a legitimate replacement to a wear and damage prone moving part and further it seems eminently plausible that making a few sets was more cost effective than making just one. Give TA a break on this one. Or am I missing something?
Heath
Do these 2 do it for you?
http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/170738391057?ssPageName=STRK:MEWAX:IT&_trksid...
http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/170738396769?ssPageName=STRK:MEWAX:IT&_trksid...
Good thing to actually come...
Good thing to actually come from this thread:
I now know what Lunchbox's ebay account is.
I don't like him. He represents everything I dislike about this place.
My plan? I'm going to wait a while, delete this post and then bid on one of his items with the sole purpose of leaving him negative feedback. I will then repeat the whole prrocess with a different account.
Not a de-railment
Did this thread get back on track OK? A first for a thread about us!
On another matter entirely, I decided to take up a challenge and build a sputnik Chandelier...but not a typical sputnik chandelier - an actual sputnik space vessel turned into a chandelier.
It is my first lamp I've ever made.
I will post picks in a few days. Be gentle - and it would be really cool to hear some ideas on different ways to have it set in the best way possible - there is some flexibility in it's construction.
I'll post a new thread.
If you need any help, please contact us at – info@designaddict.com