Glad you asked, Whitespike--
Not because I can answer, but because I've wondered this myself.
I also owned a second set of these with the base shown in the third photo, with un-upholstered plywood seats. Someone suggested to me that they weren't McCobb, which I found hard to swallow.
The last set of four that is outdoors is Pascoe.
The set that you were looking at could possibly be Pascoe, but you would have to see the backrest.The Paul Mccobb chair has the iron that is attached to the bottom of the backrest, not the back of the backrest. I don't know about the two with the green seats because the iron has a slight "bend". Also, the Paul Mccobb chairs came with plain wooden seats, not upholstery. That however, could have been an owners doing. Straylight goes into great detail on this subject on his blog. Just type in "Pascoe" in the search box. http://paulmccobb.blogspot.com/
If that info's accurate then NONE of mine have been McCobb
since all have had the iron attached behind backrest. I'm the proud owner of Clifford Pascoe chairs, it seems.
Which came first-- the McCobb, I assume? Did both designers hit upon the design independently, or was the Pascoe version acknowledged to be a copy?
I guess all iron rod dining chairs are prone to look a lot alike, by their very nature. But add a molded plywood backrest and they begin to look suspiciously alike!
There's nothing wrong with Pascoe
As a matter of fact, I'm looking into these chairs too. Not being a purist, I could care less whether they are McCobb or Pascoe as long as the condition is good and the price is right. If one of our dinner guests flips a chair and looks for a label or points out a design misattribution, we'd just forget their invitation next time around. 🙂
If you need any help, please contact us at – info@designaddict.com