re cut and paste
what about people who cut and paste pictures of art?
Not the same.
Pictures are obvious cut and paste.
You were using words to POSE as your own.
Deception. Unless someone called you on the cut and paste, you woldnt have anxknowledged it.
this is typical example of how you deal with ideas here. Its just never ending superficial one ups manship.
Its rude to respond by dropping in some crappy boiler plate general statement too. While posing as your own words no less. Real BS. and rude.
Im pretty much exhausted, as your responses are getting predictable-- and boring.
I'm surprised
Windows offers a cut and paste option... I didn't have time to write, cuz I'm battling 7 people at once. I'm not insecure. I'm blessed. I have a formal education. I don't need it to see the writing on the wall. Neither did H.L. Hunt. He stopped in 5th grade. I graduated high school. Didn't need college.
If I thought I was better than everyone, I wouldn't have ever come here nicely looking for help. I had a point to prove, after you tried to prove me retarded. I said I'm here to learn, but not in a snobby, shallow kind of way, where only fine art is art, and everything else belongs in a dumpster. It's a stupid way to think. And The customers all recognize it as art. Again, only closed minded, art snobs don't.
"Its rude to respond by dropping in some crappy boiler plate general statement too. While posing as your own words no less. Real BS. and rude."
That was a joke. That's why I said you deal with all that. Your snobby ways only allows you to get only the most academic, bland humor.
"Deception. Unless someone called you on the cut and paste, you woldnt have anxknowledged it."
So when you quote a scripture from the bible on here about glass houses, or throwing stones, do you follow that up with: "Now that was a proverb everybody. Just so you know. That's from the bible." I don't think you say that.
Why does anyone quote anything? And don't tell me that every time in life you say anything from another source, you always tell where it came from right afterwards. Everything you've ever read, and repeated in life, is followed directly by the source. If so, your absurd. The only reason you would is to try and impress someone on a date, and again, drop names.
.
For the very last time that mirror does not belong to any accepted definition of the Aesthetic Movement. It has none of the motifs of the Aesthetic Movement. It shows no influence of Japan and the Orient. No use of pattern mixed with floral forms. None of the light blues and dark greens associated with aestheticism. No sensuality. Its not even ebonised. Its a mirror frame with an amateur landscape painted on it. Night school 'art'. Some may say a charming piece of early 20th century folk or naive art I'd rather not comment. Not aesthetic movement. Please please please before you come back with your frankly nonsensical antiques roadshow 'proof' just look at the images of Aesthetic movement objects on Google images etc - even you are capable of that - to see that what you have is not by any stretch Aesthetic Movement. Stop shouting and start learning. I have my own credentials by the way.
.
In fact just take a good look at that engraved tray you yourself put up and described as Art Nouveau. ITS IN YOUR POSSESSION! Can you see the Oriental influence, the pattern and nature forms together, the space left unadorned? Voila. Aesthetic Movement. Not the best but it'll do for this purpose. I'm actually trying to help you here but no doubt your arrogance won't let you see that.
Well if you're
trying to help me, I appreciate it, but the tray is already gone. I sold it on ebay. I found it at an estate sale in the basement. I didn't know anything about it, except I liked the design, and the pattern really jumped out at me. I thought it would make nice wall hanging piece. Here's the problem. Not everything falls into what you can find on google images.
That's what you don't get. Just because it's not on google images, or a book, or fits in with a traditional standard way of thinking, doesn't mean it can't be from then. Maybe her dad died in a seaweed pond, and she's terrified of green, but loved to paint. Again. You can't accept variables, or think outside the box. If it's not spelled out for you, you can't read it. It actually has light blues, and there's green under the snow. It's a winter scene. Can you see that? Not a lot of green snow out there. Again, when you're that closed minded, you can't use common sense to realize not every person in the world painted exactly the same way at that time period. Some people weren't textbook followers, no matter what time period you're from.
It's not the tone...
I'm laughing. I get a kick out of it. It's that I like to talk to people that can see things more than one way. I'm very open minded, and take it all in. I'm ready to learn from all angles. I have a hard time dealing with authority driven scholars who think they know it all by default, and fitting down their one way streets. If that lady would have listened to that expert professor, she would have been fuk'd.
Instead she chose not to follow procedure, and standards, and contexts, and went beyond him, and his degrees, and his awards, and his published articles, and his reputation, and his vast wealth of "don't try to challenge me" type knowledge, until it was proved right. See, sometimes that has to be done with a crowd like you, and your minions. To let you know that you're not the leading authority on "all" things art related. You may know a lot, but you don't know it all. Just because every piece doesn't fit into a museum, doesn't mean it's not art.
When you're green you grow, when you're ripe you rot.
Now that was a quote from an article out of Readers Digest. Just wanted you to know that was A quote. Not mine. From Readers Digest. May 17, 1982. Volume 5, Chapter 6, Page 234. No sorry. 243. Page 243. Newsstand edition.
Ya...
You should do that Paul. Maybe it'll knock some sense into you, while I sit there and laugh in the background. Just because something doesn't fit the exact cliche of colors, and patterns from what has been labeled as the norm, doesn't mean it can't be from that era. You know, some people lived through the Aesthetic Movement, didn't mean they had to follow it. They were just alive then, and loved to paint. Some people thought on their own. Maybe they had their own influence. Not what everyone else did.
Again, that's where being so closed minded get's you. It can't be right. There's no way. Just like that couldn't be a real pollock. Let me ask you this. Was there snow during the Aesthetic Movemment? If someone painted a winter scene during then, don't you think there'd naturally be a lack of green? Was there no country during the Aesthetic Movement? No farmers? No countrymen. Only people who knew japanese, and lived during that time period painted? No one else ever right? Even the countrymen painted japanese? Seriously. Get a clue.
I watch those ideas like yours get dropped all the time on Antiques Roadshow, because someone will have something completely out of the ordinary from a time period that doesn't fit the standard, and it'll be appraised way out there sometimes. They always talk about unusual pieces for the time period. There are variables in life man. Not everything is soooo black and white. Can't you get that? If you get off the line will you wreck? Cuz you follow it to a tee.
If you need any help, please contact us at – info@designaddict.com