I've had these chairs for a while, always planned on reselling them, that I only bothered to clean one of the chairs. Since then we moved to a new house, and they had a home in a breakfast area, minus a table. I bought a tilt top table for the chairs today. I like the look, but I would appreciate some other opinions.
It's not likely that many on this forum will argue that your table is a good stylistic match for the chairs, so perhaps approaching the question from a functional perspective would be better.
It is generally accepted that seating four at a round dining table requires a diameter of at least 32 inches with 36 or more for greater comfort. Seat height in relation to table surface is also important. Seat heights average around 17 1/2 inches and tables around 29 with higher for formal situations and lower for relaxed dining. Personal preference comes into play here as well as consideration of chair width, arms, table aprons, etc., so some trial and error is involved here, too.
From your photo, it appears that your table may be a tad small for the 4 chairs. I think a pedestal table is a good choice, but I like chairs to be tucked in when not in use and the crest rails on your chairs look like they'd prevent tucking in all the way.
Visually, a square table might be better. You could try laying a piece of cardboard 36" square on top of the table to just see how that feels.
Everybody is being really nice. Frankly, that table is not good. Judging by the pottery and other items in the background, I would go for a lucite table or an iron table or any combination of white/chrome/glass, etc.
Your chairs automatically lead the eye to the seat, (bright blue), and downward to what amounts to 16 curved, light wood, legs. Therefore, your table needs to focus the eye above the seat level with a very, very simple base with an emphasis on the table top. Otherwise you just get chaos.
+1 for something simple like a Saarinen base with a white/grey marble top.
If you need any help, please contact us at – info@designaddict.com