This room must contain
something by Charles and Ray Eames, something by George Nelson, something by Poul Kjaerholm or Arne Jacobsen, something by Florence Knoll or Aero Saarinen, something by Paul McCobb or Edward Wormley. A couple of cool Italian lamps, some high quality Bitossi or similar type pottery.
Heh-heh
good one, BTM. Not all our friends and neighbors will get that one, perhaps.
If jazz is a uniquely American contribution (and I suppose there must be exceptions to that presumption), then so perhaps is the Eames/Nelson/Knoll school of colorful and clean postwar modernism. . .? Would the Shaker forebear, a clean and minimal form of traditional design, also qualify as American contribution ?
(There, see ? A political thread needn't be scary. . .!)
It's President Pompidou who...
It's President Pompidou who was the first to bring modern design at the Elysée. But you are right, Mitterand also had furniture designed especially for him by Paulin and Starck.
Here is a picture of the Elysée in 1971.
Click on the link below for more pictures.
http://www.pixelcreation.fr/graphismeart-design/design-architecture/pier...
At one time
Royal (and presidential) patronage of the finest artists and artesans of the day was considered the norm. It was considered good taste to seek out the newest and latest things.
This seems to have fallen from favour sometime in the Early Twentieth Century, to the extent that we now have the Prince Of Wales commenting unfavourably on anything modern or forward-thinking and preferring a mock (Classical, rural or whatever) sentimentalist approach to what he considers 'design'
Is it the same in other European countries, or has Design become purely for the masses, I wonder ?
Other than Pompidou and Mitterand of France, has any other President, ruler or monarch of anywhere paid more than lip-service to the architects, designers and artists of the day ?
(other than the mandatory pre-election photocall )
If you need any help, please contact us at – info@designaddict.com