Design Addict

Cart

"Dead on balls accu...
 

"Dead on balls accurate"  

Page 1 / 2
  RSS

glassartist
(@glassartist)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 13 years ago
Posts: 902
10/11/2011 1:18 am  

or, a restating of my issue from the Arbuck thread.

I wanted a fresh spot to clarify some things I wrote. Straylight et al, I am right there with you. Enough good info was posted by Straylight to make the case that it is bloody well unlikely that the Op's table and chairs are either Nelson or Arbuck. The only thing I took issue with (beside points stressing my original issue) was straylight's use of the terms "incontrovertible" and "I am 100% correct". We on this forum are frequently sticklers for accuracy when it comes to attributions, knock offs, and even if parts are correct.I am thinking of the very recent Papa bear thread and Straylight's discussion of Planner knock offs that are so close that even he had difficulty telling. Both only had measurement differences as the tell. Given these close shaves and others, can you not actually present the table and chairs in some original document and then claim it as either incontrovertible or that you are 100% correct? I do not believe so. Was an excellent case made? absolutely. But was it dead on balls accurate?


Quote
glassartist
(@glassartist)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 13 years ago
Posts: 902
10/11/2011 1:26 am  

I forgot
"dead on balls accurate" was a line by Marisa Tomei from the movie My Cousin Vinnie in response to her attorney/ boyfriend asking how she knew something with certainty.


ReplyQuote
Lunchbox
(@lunchbox)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 15 years ago
Posts: 1208
10/11/2011 1:27 am  

Yes...
It was.


ReplyQuote
NULL NULL
(@paulannapaulanna-homechoice-co-uk)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 696
10/11/2011 1:34 am  

not another arbuck thread?
This is like in Cloverfield where the big monster starts dropping little monsters all over the place.


ReplyQuote
Lunchbox
(@lunchbox)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 15 years ago
Posts: 1208
10/11/2011 1:53 am  

Aye...
Let it rest.


ReplyQuote
spacepirate1
(@jonjbayareayahoo-com)
Honorable Member
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 131
10/11/2011 2:09 am  

Incontrovertible Fact: This...
Incontrovertible Fact: This guy's name is Nelson George.


ReplyQuote
birds&stuff
(@breakmedown1hotmail-com)
Trusted Member
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 40
10/11/2011 2:14 am  

^^^^ LIKE
^^^^ LIKE


ReplyQuote
glassartist
(@glassartist)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 13 years ago
Posts: 902
10/11/2011 2:18 am  

I would of course
need to see a certified driver's licsence, fingerprints, a retinal scan, sworn statements, social security card, tax records, and a check for 20.00 dollars. Oh, no, wait. That would make me the INS.


ReplyQuote
NULL NULL
(@teapotd0meyahoo-com)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 4318
10/11/2011 2:36 am  

GN NG
Both stand-up guys.... I presume.


ReplyQuote
Killian
(@killian)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 15 years ago
Posts: 818
10/11/2011 2:44 am  

How about...
Bang on, near enough !!
As they say in the building trade over here.


ReplyQuote
TinyArmada
(@tinyarmada)
Famed Member
Joined: 13 years ago
Posts: 361
10/11/2011 2:47 am  

It IS back again.
It has raised it's head again. You're right - it is Cloverfield...Part III according to the last count.
You can prove it is George Nelson by knowing and verifying everything he did. And compare.
Or you can find a genuine attribution to the exact chairs and table we posted.
Those are the only two ways. And neither has been accomplished.
Straylight found information that points to it being highly likely that the set we posted is not George Nelson and that previous attributions are in error.
It is inconclusive, but on the balance of evidence presented, it is likely it is not George Nelson and that straylight is PROBABLY right.
If this was all the evidence that could be found, I would go with straylight on it. But it isn't all the information that can be obtained.
Sraylight and anyone else should exclude 'incontrovertible' and 'absolute' from the equation and we have a fair and reasonable statement about the information straylight unearthed.
I would venture to say once the Vitra Curator has culled through his records (which are the most complete archives in existence to my knowledge on this period of Nelson) and informs us of what they he/she has found, we can sit tight.
We will post the results which are expected in about 2 weeks.
- A.S.


ReplyQuote
Mark
 Mark
(@mark)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 15 years ago
Posts: 4586
10/11/2011 2:54 am  

Incontrovertible fact:
This lovechunks name ('s) is/ are Nelson.


ReplyQuote
SDR
 SDR
(@sdr)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 15 years ago
Posts: 6462
10/11/2011 3:00 am  

Oooh . . .
Super-icky. And I don't even know what they sound like . . .


ReplyQuote
glassartist
(@glassartist)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 13 years ago
Posts: 902
10/11/2011 3:01 am  

Now these Nelsons
need no introduction. No, Please, really, I beg you.


ReplyQuote
Lunchbox
(@lunchbox)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 15 years ago
Posts: 1208
10/11/2011 3:04 am  

A curse on both your houses...
What were you thinking, glassartist?


ReplyQuote
Page 1 / 2
Share:

If you need any help, please contact us at – info@designaddict.com

  
Working

Please Login or Register