Design Addict

Cart

Can anyone authenti...
 

Can anyone authenticate these DKR-2 chairs.  

Page 1 / 2
  RSS

dready
(@dready)
Active Member
Joined: 14 years ago
Posts: 12
23/06/2009 2:13 am  

Some have claimed these are newer reissued (Modernica) bases. Can someone please share the differences between the Herman Miller and Modernica Eiffel bases (and seats for that matter).

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&ssPageName=STRK:MESELX:IT&item=220436484725


Quote
NULL NULL
(@teapotd0meyahoo-com)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 4318
23/06/2009 2:29 am  

Hmm
The condition of these chairs is curious. I have never seen vintage bases that shiny or without some kind of tarnish. I have a zinc Eiffel base at home which I believe may be made by Modernica (but not certain since I have never seen a definite one in person to compare). On the base that I have, I know the black spacers on the glides are plastic instead of rubber. The main rods are thicker than Herman Miller. I will take a closer look tonight.
The very early wire shells did not have weld reinforcements on the sides where the shell bends. However, I'm not sure when the reinforcements were added. Eames Office shows a 1952 example that looks like it does have the reinforcements.


ReplyQuote
LuciferSum
(@lucifersum)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 14 years ago
Posts: 1874
23/06/2009 3:10 am  

Suspicious
Modernica Bases - almost guaranteed. WAY too shiny to be vintage, and Modernica supplies you with the locking washers you can see in the underside pics.
Also - one of the chairs is effed up along the top. In the pictures of the chairs without the bikinis you'll notice one chair has a graceful arch where the other has a dent in the wire.


ReplyQuote
dready
(@dready)
Active Member
Joined: 14 years ago
Posts: 12
23/06/2009 3:25 am  

Interesting
The dented chair seems not to be dented but the bow seems to be part of the design as the paint is fine, no dents or dings or broken wire that would be apparent if it were bent. Hmmm? The bikini pads also seem very vintage.
Thanks for the insight. Keep it coming. Opinions? Like or contrary?


ReplyQuote
NULL NULL
(@teapotd0meyahoo-com)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 4318
23/06/2009 4:25 am  

Okay
I am looking at the base I have now.
As I mentioned, the main rods are beefy. Even thicker than the Vitra re-issue, which I believe are slightly thicker than the original Herman Miller.
The ends where the glides are attached are not perfectly squared off like the ones in the listing. They are slightly rounded. However, Modernica has been known to change their base design (e.g. low rod base, for sure). Squared-off end is easier to fabricate. Under the cap nut there is a small black spacer which is also plastic. This appears to be the case with the ones in the listing as well. I haven't seen the original Herman Miller glides so I don't know if both spacers were used or just the larger one.
For grins, I just broke out the micrometer:
Reproduction base: ~9.8 mm diameter
Vitra re-issue base: ~8.8 mm
Herman Miller base: ~7.8 mm
So I was right... 🙂


ReplyQuote
dready
(@dready)
Active Member
Joined: 14 years ago
Posts: 12
23/06/2009 4:41 am  

Second production bases?
Didn't second production bases have the metal glides.
Also - what diameter are your referring to in your measurements?


ReplyQuote
NULL NULL
(@teapotd0meyahoo-com)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 4318
23/06/2009 4:42 am  

Diameter of the main rods of the base
Yes, these are first generation style glides.
Second generation glides were the push-on type with rubber sleeve/boot and metal foot.


ReplyQuote
Lunchbox
(@lunchbox)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 14 years ago
Posts: 1208
23/06/2009 5:34 am  

Modernica
to be sure.


ReplyQuote
dready
(@dready)
Active Member
Joined: 14 years ago
Posts: 12
23/06/2009 6:04 am  

I appreciate it...
If you weigh in, please take the time to state why you think the bases were made by one manufacturer over another. Thanks.
PS Anyone want to take a stab at value?
PSS The estate company claimed these chairs had been in the home for many many years. The pads show serious. The other midcentury furnishings were immaculate. Modernica hasn't been around that long. Are you all sure these can't be originals?


ReplyQuote
NULL NULL
(@singlecellgmail-com)
Active Member
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 14
23/06/2009 6:15 am  

i'm going
to play devil's advocate..
if you check out the high resolution images for this wright listing, not sure if you can definitively say the earlier dkr's *didn't* have squared off feet mounts.. they don't look exactly square, but they don't look to be rounded either..
however, the condition of the eBay chairs look to be unmatched...
http://wright20.com/auctions/view_search/GD2E/GD2G/122/LA/dkr/G20I


ReplyQuote
NULL NULL
(@teapotd0meyahoo-com)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 4318
23/06/2009 6:20 am  

Thanks for that link
Yes, the leg ends do look to be squared off in those pics. But the ends are also much smaller than the ones in the listing. The ones in the listing are fat!
You can also get a sense of the delicacy of the bases (i.e. thinner rods).


ReplyQuote
NULL NULL
(@teapotd0meyahoo-com)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 4318
23/06/2009 6:25 am  

Value
If the shells and bases are Modernica, then 50% of Modernica's retail price might be fair.


ReplyQuote
LuciferSum
(@lucifersum)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 14 years ago
Posts: 1874
23/06/2009 7:49 am  

Okay
Looking at the Wright link, I'm fairly certain it's not very plausible for the eBay chairs to be vintage. Look at the matte finish on the Wright bases vs. the glossy finish of the eBay ones.
Also look at the way the Wright cushions are indented. I know the eBay listing says the chairs weren't very much used, but I'm really suspicious of this listing. Just too many questions about it for comfort.


ReplyQuote
dready
(@dready)
Active Member
Joined: 14 years ago
Posts: 12
23/06/2009 9:55 pm  

And the shells?
Any thoughts on the age and manufacturer of the shells? Do these look like Herman Miller?


ReplyQuote
Modern Love
(@modern-love)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 12 years ago
Posts: 947
23/06/2009 10:34 pm  

Hey friend,
These are fakes.
100% fakes.
100% Modernica fakes.
The one on the left is newer Modernica.
The one on the right (with the little bump) is Modernica circa 2002-2004, see photo below.
F-A-K-E-S
Pass on these, it's not as if there wont be hundreds more opportunities for Eames Wire Chairs on eBay in the future.


ReplyQuote
Page 1 / 2
Share:

If you need any help, please contact us at – info@designaddict.com

  
Working

Please Login or Register