I'm a fan of Charles and Ray like a lot of people. I own several books and even a movie about them. But as I sit here in my shell chair, I'm left wondering- what is their biggest design failure? All my books talk about their successes. Surely they must of thought something was going to be great and it turned out not so good. I know their personal life had some bumps in the road, but I want to know where they struggled most design wise. Thanks DA friends.
good thread chair love
I will have to think about this...
There is the first ultra low LAX lounge chairs that always seem to have rewelds to the base because the metal cracked so often. But that just made them refine and move forward to a better design. Even though the base cracked all the time, I do like the way those chairs looked on that base.
Or do you just mean ugly? The oddball high-backed version padded arm shell maybe?
Good thread.
.
Though not their change and I'm not usually a purist the 5 star base on the aluminium group chairs is unfortunate.
Not a flop but not nice. Just had a thought about the shockmounts though, could the backs of the rubber have concentric rings cast into them and into the backrest have a matching cut. It would really increase the glue surface area and might be an improvement.
Well..
I once had an Eames aluminum group lounge chair with the taller back (and neck pillow), that had a 4 star base (which I agree looks better)...and it did tip over a few times whilst I was perched upon it reading romance novels. I gave it to a friend. Now I seem to tip over whilst perched on just about anything but a bar stool.
I'm going to hell,
Aunt Mark
heath
I agree about the 5 star aluminum group base being an unfortunate change, at least as far as looks go. I have both examples, and the four-point base is by far more pleasing to look at. (But I caved in and made a practical choice FOR ONCE!)
Not sure when they made the switch, but I think it must be because of the "tilt" feature that was added. The newer soft pad chairs have a very nice tilt feature, and after hearing about Mark's experience, I can see why the four point base would not be a good idea when tilting way back.
Too bad when form and function have to be traded for one another. Sigh...
If you need any help, please contact us at – info@designaddict.com