I thought recent productions ...
I thought recent productions only came in walnut, cherry, santos palisander, red, black, and light/white ash (which look very different from this veneer). Even Herman Miller's website doesn't seem to have a choice that resembles this veneer. Can someone please explain that? Thanks.
Peeled veneer
would never yield the repeated and symmetrical plain-sliced patterns we see in book-matched veneered surfaces. The four leaves we see here are not excessively narrow, in my view. Readers should not view veneered surfaces as some sort of inferior version of solid wood, any more than they would expect the potato-chip seat and back to somehow be hewn from a single log . . .
On the other hand, it could be argued that a larger and perhaps asymmetrical surface pattern would not be out of place on this chair. It is a more-or-less accepted principle in woodwork that, the more more complex the form, the plainer should be the grain pattern -- and, to some extent, vice versa. The pony-hide (?) version of this chair would be the extreme example. That raises the question, "Is this chair a simple or a complex form ?"
We've all seen ash-veneered DCMs and DCWs that we liked more than this chair; perhaps the grain was wilder (though still balanced) in some earlier examples. In retrospect I'm not sure a peeled hardwood one-piece veneer would be wrong for this design . . .
Common name for Fraxinus americana.
The internet is a wonderful place.
http://www.hobbithouseinc.com/personal/woodpics/ash,%20white.htm
If you need any help, please contact us at – info@designaddict.com