Search result for: di frutta
| # | Post Title | Result Info | Date | User | Forum |
| haha | 1 Relevance | 12 years ago | Eameshead | General discussion | |
| haha good one OW. If the original poster were to type in "Eames LTR base" on ebay, and scroll six or seven items down, there are knock-off chrome LTR bases for 35.90 ("or best offer" no less!) I obviously do not attest to the quality or dimensions or anything else being true to the originals on these knock offs, but in general, the LTR base IS the same as the two bases on the ETR. (Elliptical Table) (This is also not an endorsement of the seller) Hope this helps. | |||||
| My wife loves her EDU. | 1 Relevance | 12 years ago | fastfwd | General discussion | |
| ... desks from that era were intended only for writing and don't really have room for computers. The only issue with the EDU is that the birch desktop surface is easily damaged. If you get an EDU, buy a glass top for it immediately; the dimensions are 28" x 60", with a 3/8" radius on the corners. | |||||
| Misinformed | 1 Relevance | 12 years ago | jcgraham | General discussion | |
| Misinformed Real dimensions are on knoll website. Where do you get your information? | |||||
| Brick House... | 1 Relevance | 12 years ago | Grendel_The_Cat | General discussion | |
| Brick House... that is what I had in mind, something on the plain side, and it looks to be about 2/3 the size of the Nelson? dimensions are from Modernica's website | |||||
| last posts | 1 Relevance | 12 years ago | kate kaplan | General discussion | |
| last posts at least for now - if anyone wants a closer look at an item, I might have a photograph - or, I might have some info on where the thing was sold - and if anyone has anything to add, I'd love to hear it. In the meantime, the Sloan's ad is from 1958, well outside the New dimensions period, but its inclusion with those materials probably means that my father designed the furniture, when he was freelancing after New dimensions closed. the final pic is a page from the 1953 Akron Art Institute Young Designers show. I hope you've all enjoyed this. I have. ... | |||||
| my pleasure | 1 Relevance | 12 years ago | kate kaplan | General discussion | |
| my pleasure I'm happy to share what I have - and to know what all of you think or any experience you have of any of these products - Designed for Moderns was all about new materials (typical of the time, I think) and Micarta was big. An ad (because I don't have anything else documenting those tables), a photo, and the reverse of the photo, with dimensions | |||||
| Tex, the pieces of ash I have | 1 Relevance | 11 years ago | tktoo | General discussion | |
| ... I made a dozen years ago. I could mill them to whatever dimensions you want. I really do agree that tripod legs are the way to go here. Slightly splayed just like SDR's drawing. Your slab is going to move seasonally. Cupping, winding, bowing, you name it. Three points of contact eliminates any issue of rocking. Hell, the legs would only need to be close to the same length. 3/8" out of flat over a what, 10-12" width is a lot for a top surface of a table. A belt sander is the most expedient way to deal with that. With the grain running in so many directions, ... | |||||
| After checking a dozen of | 1 Relevance | 11 years ago | DrPoulet | General discussion | |
| After checking a dozen of these tables on google, you are absolutely right, the top of the legs have a very slightly different shape than PJ's ones. Agree as well on the knockdown construction, I cannot imagine a company running 2 lines: knockdown and assembled. I am extremely confused now. On one hand the dimensions, material and general design match the PJ one. On another, it is not knockdown construction as it should and the design of the top of the legs is slightly different. There are way too many similarities for just an inspiration. Could it be a knoc ... | |||||
| I agree, it's not Jacobsen. | 1 Relevance | 12 years ago | Peter Dalsgaard | General discussion | |
| I agree, it's not Jacobsen. The dimensions are way off. However, the stool "dot chair" (model 3170) is nowadays only produced with 4 legs by Fritz Hansen. Jacobsen designed the dot chair alongside his work on the ant chair (3100) in the early fifties. Both chairs were designed with 3 legs. Fritz Hansen altered this in 1970, where they "updated" the dot chair to 4 legs, while the ant chair became available in both a 3-legged and 4-legged (3101) version. | |||||
| Leif, | 1 Relevance | 12 years ago | tchp | General discussion | |
| Leif, The catalog pages have a clear plastic overlay sheet that lists the names of the Makers, the Designers, and the model numbers of the items, as well as their dimensions. The manufacturer's names are listed across the top of the page, and the designers are listed on the bottom of the page. It appears that the designer's name is directly under the the maker's name that they were working for, so, in the case of this catalog page, Glyngore is shown to be the maker of the ottoman/bench, and the name directly below Glyngore is Peder Kristensen, who also app ... | |||||
| How fortunate for you that | 1 Relevance | 12 years ago | SDR | General discussion | |
| How fortunate for you that you are comfortable on firm and unyielding surfaces ! Thanks for that explanation. I was about to raise the vital issue that different persons -- varying bodies, varying tastes -- require somewhat different seating configurations to satisfy them. This is what makes chair design unique among all the furniture types. Thus, the chair is always a matter of compromise; the designer presumably suits himself when arriving at dimensions and angles. For me (and for many, apparently) the provision of a back support at the lumbar region -- ... | |||||
| Huh? | 1 Relevance | 12 years ago | NULL NULL | General discussion | |
| Huh? I am struggling to understand how one's arms would properly rest on those arm rests. The dimensions may shed some light. Edit: This is not "hate". It is constructive critique based on the image presented. The OP welcomed any comments. | |||||
| I would love to see more... | 1 Relevance | 12 years ago | l1flafly | General discussion | |
| I would love to see more... I would love to see more pics from the New dimensions catalog you have. For easiest posting of photos you can direct link the image once you have uploaded it and paste the actual direct image link in the section "associated web images" | |||||
| I usually use the plastic | 1 Relevance | 12 years ago | Spanky | General discussion | |
| I usually use the plastic hanger that comes wrapped with free polyester braided rope at the big box hardware stores. It's only $3 plus you get all that rope! Before I discovered that one, I used one that I cut myself out of 1/4 plywood (dimensions below). You don't have to sand it and make it perfectly smooth and splinter-free the way you do for shuttles used in weaving fabric, which would be like the two you pictured. Paper cord is tough stuff and can stand up to unsanded plywood. The important thing is that the shuttle is thin itself because it needs ... | |||||
| mgee76, thanks so much for | 1 Relevance | 12 years ago | Saskia Sask | General discussion | |
| mgee76, thanks so much for all of this info. I really like the proportions with the foam that you've used, so I'm glad to know the dimensions. (I've been puzzling over this for quite a while.) I'm dying to finish my loveseat, but I need to wait for spring so that I can work outside. I have experimented on my loveseat with a little bit with General Finishes gel stain. I've tried four different colours, but the walnut shade looked best to me. I do find the beech on this loveseat to be more pink than I would like, so the green in the walnut stain seems to neutr ... | |||||
If you need any help, please contact us at – info@designaddict.com